As an American culture, we seem to be obsessed with solving problems chemically (pest control, losing weight, curing illness, growing and making food, etc.) instead of naturally. Does this ring true to you? If so, why do you think we are like this? If not, explain.
4 comments:
Again, I agree 100%. And I hope you don't get sick of me talking about nutrition, but since that's my world I'll do it again. People seek out "unnatural" cure-alls because it's EASY! Wouldn't you prefer to take a handful of supplements while eating whatever you want, feeling secure (although incorrectly so) that your body isn't devoid of vital nutrients? Wouldn't you rather take a pill to lose weight than resolve emotional compulsions to overeat?
There are reasons that the supplement industry makes billions a year, and millions are signing up for gastric by-pass. Often, a "band-aid" solution creates much greater problems in the long run.
You may not believe it, but in some places in the United States of America I have actually seen entire companies, whose sole purpose is to take the natural earth around our homes and bring in large gas-guzzling Kubota® tractors to pull out the rocks, bushes and trees, and make sure the ground is perfectly level and devoid of life. Then they import artificial sod from Miami, Florida and cover everything in a homogenous Springfield-green grass (the ‘preferred plant’ of the US). Weekly, or more, they spend hours riding their Robomow® lawnmowers back and forth in consecutive lines or circles to ensure that the artificial sod remains at an artificial length--1 1/4 inches. Eventually, when the natural plants (aka ‘weeds’) begin to grow back, said companies come in to liberally ‘apply’ (never ‘spray’) the 1 1/4 inch grass with “just the right amount” of poisons which have the additional bonus of killing anything else that may happen to walk across it (i.e. insects, birds, and the occasional infant). Later, when the alien Springfield-green grass begins to fade, they come in again with a barrage of chemicals to bring it back to its ‘natural’ color. To further supplement this process, then they build intricate underground water pipes which bring fresh mountain water down to sprinkle the alien sod three times a day (alleviating the drudgery of the house owner’s continual struggle with the garden hose), and all this in the beautiful, lush, fertile back yards of Mesa, Arizona.
Update: once Silent Spring was written, this process actually changed dramatically, and instead of applying Nitrogen to the sod (for that beautiful green color) house owners have cut costs and simply begun spray-painting their lawns. I have heard that Springfield-green is still the preferred hue, but with so many colors of paint to choose from, why stick with one?
I fully agree with Marci that people use chemicals because they are easier, and frankly take less time and emotional effort. I also think though that because we associate science with progress in our culture, we view natural solutions as backward, and even in some cases vaguely pagan or non-Christian. Does this make sense? For example, we associate healing with herbal remedies with not only pioneers, but also witch doctors.
I agree that we put a lot of faith and trust in science. I think Pollan and Carson raise a very good point that as we come to understand parts of complex interactions within the natural world, we think we have the whole picture. Unfortunately, as we try to understand things and pick them apart with modern technology it is easy to miss things without knowing it. Whereas as we have built things with technology, if we miss something, we know it because the computer doesn't work or the bridge falls down. I think the success of technology at creation has led us to believe that we can do the same in reverse. Unfortunately, there is never any way of knowing if we've seen all the details and we never know what consequences are occurring because of it.
Post a Comment